https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuiXtdq51Bg
Discuss.
The claim that their relationship ended when he called tomake a date with someone else is false. Their relationship was already over at that point.
In the meantime the video ignores most of the evidence that corroborates Julie's claims and just makes the unsupported allegation she made up everything just to spite Jeremy.
It make no sense for her to make up such a detailed acocunt and even less sense to make up a hit man was uses where she knew Jeremy had no alibi. Making up a hitman story would only make sense if Jeremy had an alibi and could thus not have done it himself. Naming a hitman who could prove he didn't do it makes even less sense still.
The only evidence it attacks is the moderator with lie that her DNA was not foudn in the moderator and suggesting this proves it was not her blood that was found in 1985 and 1986 by the prosecution and defense experts. In fact her DNA was found but there is no evidence any of the DNA found was blood based because in 1999 the moderator teste dnegative for the prsence of blood. The DNA tests proved nothing at all. They did not refute the evidence that Sheial's blood was found inside and in any event the notion Sheila attached the moderator til kill everyone then removed it and put it away to conceal she used it on them is absurd.
Next video is spent on the worthless issue of the NOTW article. Never is it suggested she lied in order to get a deal with the NOTW so the endgame seems to be just to trash her to make her look bad so viewers will get anegative view of her and want to disbelieve her for having a negative view.
Then it claims she was investigated for 5 crimes 2 of which were before she even met Jeremy or without his knowledge. It doesn't go into more detail. All the crimes wer ein fact supposedly done whil eshe knew Jerey though. The ones that listed her as an accessory fail to mention were to aid Jeremy. Jeremy was the one who robbed the Caravan site, and was growing, importing and selling drugs. She aided him. So if you attakc her credibility over such it harms his credibility even more since he was behind these things and she just aided him. She sometimes did drugs with him other times without. That is apparently one of the things allegedly done without his knowledge- taking drugs when she was not with him. The other thing of coruse was the checkbook fraud which she repaid and did because she wanted to impress him since he called her a goody goody. Naturally they leave that out and just try to make it look like she was a criminal so not trustworthy. This is propaganda so full disclosure is intentially avoided. The goal is to fool people.
It also ignores that the only reason police knew about these supposed crimes was because Julie detailed them to police in her September 1985 statement implicating Jeremy. So but for implicating Jeremy and including them when she did police never woudl have known about any such crimes. She coudl have implicated him without admitting any of these crimes but decided to mention them. The video though dishonestly suggests that police found out she committed the listed crimes and thnen in order to avoid liability she turned on Jeremy and made up the stories implicating him.
Whee you know the truth and see them lying like this it doesn't bode well because if they can't use the truth to help Jeremy and instead have to resport to lies then it is obvious he really is guilty. If they had evidence he is innocent they would post it and not need to post lies.
